NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The future of a barrier of giant buoys that Texas Gov. Greg Abbot placed in the Rio Grande last year to deter migrant traffic may turn on whether a rocky, shallow stretch of the border river can be considered “navigable” and whether immigration sometimes constitutes a hostile invasion.
The full 17-member 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments on the issues in New Orleans on Wednesday, the latest courtroom debate in multiple legal disputes over border control between Democratic President Joe Biden and the Republican governor. The judges did not indicate when they would rule.
Part of the hearing touched on Texas’ claim that the barrier is authorized constitutionally as a means of defending against an invasion.
“Are you saying that federal law overcomes the constitutional right of the state?” Judge Edith Jones asked Justice Department attorney Michael Gray. She later added: “Under what circumstances can the United States thwart that attempt at self-defense?”
Blinken's Kyiv song choice raises eyebrows as Ukraine fights fierce Russian attacks
Global South urged to make voices heard
China Coast Guard stops four Philippine individuals from intruding into Huangyan Island
Airshow China kicks off in port city Zhuhai
Bayern gives contracts to trio of promising teenagers
Flying Tigers veteran visits Great Wall in Beijing
Interview: Expert says U.S. interest rate hikes causing ripple effects in developing countries
China's space station looking forward to participation of foreign astronauts
#MeToo struggled to find traction in France. Then Judith Godrèche came forward
Bolivia urges UN to facilitate peace in Middle East
Barron Trump won't be serving as a Florida delegate to the RNC
China's space station lab module Mengtian ready for launch